Right Law Group Criminal Defense Case Studies

Right Law Group is a Colorado criminal defense law firm with extensive experience handling serious felony charges, DUI cases, domestic violence matters, and complex criminal litigation throughout Colorado. Our attorneys have backgrounds as former prosecutors and specialized criminal defense advocates, bringing insider knowledge of Colorado’s criminal justice system to every case.

Our attorneys have successfully:

• Dismissed attempted murder and attempted homicide charges
• Won not guilty verdicts at trial for DUI and violent crimes
• Negotiated deferred sentences in serious felony cases
• Sealed and expunged criminal records across Colorado
  

Geographic Coverage: We represent clients throughout the Denver metro area and Colorado Front Range, with primary offices serving Denver County, El Paso County, Douglas County, Arapahoe County, and Jefferson County. We also handle cases in Teller County, Pueblo County, and Fremont County. 

Case Study Index by Charge Type

Violent Crimes & Assault

• Assault with a Deadly Weapon – Road Rage (Gannon Becker)
• Attempted Murder – Self-Defense Stabbing (Matthew Chaput)
• Attempted Homicide – Domestic (Gannon Becker)
• Attempted Murder – Drug Deal (Alexis Austin Litle)
• Felony Menacing (Matthew Chaput)
• Felony Menacing – Road Rage (Alexis Austin Litle)
• Veteran’s Attempted Homicide & Vehicular Assault (Alexis Austin Litle)

DUI Cases

• DUI – Body Camera Violations (Gannon Becker)
• DUI – Not Guilty at Trial (Matthew Chaput)
• Felony DUI – Fourth Offense (Zoe Levesque)
• DUI – Three-Car Accident (Jimmy Litle)
• DUI – Actual Physical Control (Alexis Austin Litle)
• Vehicular Assault – DUI (Jimmy/Alexis Austin Litle)

Domestic Violence

• Multiple DV Cases – No DV Convictions (Matthew Chaput)
• DV Case – 13 Month Dismissal (Jimmy Litle)
• DV & Child Abuse – Illegal Search (Jimmy Litle)
• Four DV Cases – One Deferred (Jimmy Litle)
• DV – Air Force Career Saved (Zoe Levesque)

Property Crimes

• Trespassing – Landlord (Gannon Becker)
• Burglary & Theft – At-Risk Adult (Jimmy Litle)

Weapons & Firearms

• Reckless Discharge – Felony (Zoe Levesque)
• Wildlife Violation – Bear Shooting (Alexis Austin Litle)

Other Serious Charges

• Explosive Devices – Nitroglycerin (Zoe Levesque)
• Hit and Run – Serious Bodily Injury (Jimmy Litle)

 

Case 1: Assault with a Deadly Weapon Charges Dismissed in Road Rage Incident

Attorney: Gannon Becker
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado Springs, El Paso County Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Assault with a Deadly Weapon (Crime of Violence)
Potential Sentence: 12 years Colorado Department of Corrections (Prison)
Outcome: Complete Dismissal and Sealing
Practice Area: Violent Crimes Defense, Self-Defense Cases

Case Overview

I represented a client charged with assault with a deadly weapon, a serious felony in Colorado. The case stemmed from a road rage incident where my client’s vehicle was alleged to be the deadly weapon. The client was in a frightening situation where the alleged victim escalated the confrontation to the point that my client felt threatened for his safety.

What the Client Was Facing

Due to the charge being classified as a crime of violence under Colorado law, my client was facing a potential prison sentence of 12 years in the Colorado Department of Corrections. Beyond the significant jail time, a felony conviction would have carried severe collateral consequences, including the loss of civil liberties, inability to possess firearms, and damage to his reputation and employment prospects.

Procedural Posture

The client was formally charged with assault with a deadly weapon. Our firm was hired during the pretrial phase of the case, where we had the opportunity to present evidence and arguments to the District Attorney’s office before the case proceeded further through the Colorado criminal justice system.

Defense Strategy

Our defense was centered on the principle of self-defense under Colorado Revised Statutes. We meticulously reviewed the evidence, including body-worn camera footage, and were able to demonstrate that the alleged victim was the aggressor. We pulled timestamps from the footage and gathered statements from witnesses at the scene who corroborated our client’s account that the alleged victim was escalating the situation by banging on the window, taking pictures, and confronting my client in a threatening manner.

Key Defense Actions

• Evidence Review: Conducted a thorough review of all evidence, with a particular focus on the body-worn camera footage from responding officers.
• Witness Interviews: Identified and interviewed witnesses who observed the incident and supported our self-defense theory.
• Negotiation with DA: Presented a detailed analysis of the evidence to the District Attorney, highlighting the weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and the strength of our self-defense argument, including that my client had the legal right to use even more force but chose the least harmful option.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The primary risk was that a jury might not see the situation as self-defense, leading to a felony conviction and a lengthy prison sentence. However, by proactively and aggressively presenting our case to the DA, we aimed to avoid the risks of a trial altogether.

Outcome

After reviewing the evidence and arguments we presented, the District Attorney agreed to dismiss the case entirely. We were also able to have the case records sealed under Colorado law, protecting our client’s reputation and future.

Why This Case Matters

This case underscores the importance of a thorough and proactive defense in Colorado criminal cases. It demonstrates that even when facing serious felony charges with crime of violence designations, a well-supported self-defense argument can lead to a complete dismissal. This case is a testament to Right Law Group’s commitment to detailed evidence analysis and aggressive advocacy for our clients.

Keywords: Colorado assault defense, crime of violence dismissal, road rage defense attorney, self-defense Colorado, Right Law Group

 

Case 2: Client Wrongfully Charged with Burglary and Trespassing Gets Case Dismissed

Attorney: Gannon Becker
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Burglary, Trespassing
Potential Sentence: 6 years in DOC (Prison)

Outcome: Complete Dismissal and Sealing
Practice Area: Property Crimes Defense, Felony charges

Case Overview

I represented a client who was charged with burglary and trespassing in a dispute with his tenants. The tenants were causing significant problems, refused to vacate the property despite legal eviction efforts, and the situation escalated, leading to criminal charges against my client.

What the Client Was Facing

Burglary charges in Colorado can range from Class 2 to Class 4 felonies depending on the circumstances. My client was facing potential prison time, substantial fines, and a permanent felony conviction that would have impacted his ability to manage rental properties and maintain his livelihood.

Procedural Posture

My client was charged with burglary and trespassing. The case was in the pretrial phase, and I was able to intervene before it progressed further to trial.

Defense Strategy

My investigation revealed that the tenants were attempting to extort my client. They were using Colorado’s eviction laws to their advantage and threatening to make a more damaging victim impact statement if he did not comply with their demands, which included the return of their deposit despite their refusal to leave. My strategy was to expose this extortion to the District Attorney and demonstrate that the criminal charges were being weaponized in a civil dispute.

Key Defense Actions

• Investigation: I dug into the background of the dispute and uncovered the tenants’ extortionate behavior, including documented threats.
• Negotiation with DA: I presented the evidence of the tenants’ extortion to the District Attorney, arguing that their case against my client was weak and tainted by the tenants’ misconduct.

Risk and Tradeoffs

A conviction for burglary and trespassing could have had serious consequences for my client, including prison time and the inability to continue his rental property business. The risk was that the DA would not see the tenants’ actions as extortion and would proceed to trial. However, by presenting a compelling narrative backed by evidence, I was able to convince the DA of the injustice of the situation.

Outcome

The District Attorney ultimately agreed that the case was weak and dismissed all charges against my client. I was then able to have the case subsequently sealed under Colorado law, clearing his record completely.

Why This Case Matters

This case highlights the importance of looking beyond the initial charges and understanding the full context of a situation. It demonstrates that a thorough investigation can uncover crucial information that can completely change the complexion of a case. At Right Law Group, we are committed to this kind of in-depth investigation to protect our clients from wrongful prosecution.

Keywords: Colorado burglary defense, trespassing charges dismissed, wrongful prosecution Colorado, Right Law Group

 

Case 3: Attempted Homicide Charge Results in Deferred Sentence

Attorney: Gannon Becker
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Attempted Homicide (Domestic Violence)
Potential Sentence: 48 years Colorado Department of Corrections (Crime of Violence)
Outcome: Deferred Sentence to Class 5 Felony (2 years supervised probation)
Practice Area: Violent Crimes Defense, Domestic Violence Defense

Case Overview

I handled a very serious case where my client was charged with attempted homicide against his wife. The situation arose from a heated argument, during which my client discharged a firearm. While a dangerous situation, the shots were not fired directly at his wife. The initial charge was extremely severe, carrying the potential for a lengthy prison sentence.

What the Client Was Facing

An attempted homicide charge, especially in a domestic context, is one of the most serious offenses in Colorado law. My client was facing a significant prison sentence of up to 48 years in prison, likely as a crime of violence, which would have effectively ended his life. Additionally, a conviction would have resulted in permanent loss of gun rights and a violent felony on his record.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with attempted homicide. I was hired on the case while it was in the pretrial stage in state district court.

Defense Strategy

My strategy was to provide the DA additional evidence and context demonstrate that my client’s actions, while reckless, did not rise to the level of attempted murder. The goal was to secure an outcome that would avoid a felony conviction and prison time through a deferred sentence.

Key Defense Actions

• Evidence Presentation: I provided the District Attorney with additional evidence that shed light on the circumstances of the incident and my client’s state of mind.
• Negotiation: I engaged in persistent negotiations with the DA, arguing for a disposition that reflected the true nature of the event and my client’s lack of intent to kill.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of going to trial on an attempted homicide charge is immense. A conviction would have been life-altering. The tradeoff was to accept a plea to a lesser charge that would still have consequences, but would avoid the catastrophic outcome of a guilty verdict at trial. The chosen strategy was to negotiate the best possible deferred sentence.

Outcome

We successfully negotiated a two-year supervised deferred sentence to a Class 5 felony with relatively minor conditions. This was an exceptional outcome, as it means that upon successful completion of the deferred sentence, my client will be able to have the case dismissed and sealed under Colorado law, avoiding a permanent felony conviction.

Why This Case Matters

This case demonstrates that even in the face of the most serious charges, a skilled negotiator can achieve a favorable outcome. It shows that by providing the DA with a more complete picture of the events, we can sometimes persuade them to see the case in a different light. Right Law Group’s ability to navigate these complex negotiations is a key part of our practice.

Keywords: Colorado attempted homicide defense, deferred sentence Colorado, domestic violence defense attorney, serious felony negotiation, Right Law Group

 

Case 4: Attempted Murder Charges Dismissed in Self-Defense Stabbing Case

Attorney: Matthew Chaput
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Attempted Murder (3 victims)
Potential Sentence: 48 years Colorado Department of Corrections per count
Outcome: Dismissed at Preliminary Hearing
Practice Area: Violent Crimes Defense, Self-Defense Cases

Case Overview

I represented a client who was facing attempted murder charges after stabbing three individuals. The incident occurred after my client was punched, and she used a knife to defend herself. One of the alleged victims sustained a punctured lung and admitted he kept hitting her until he couldn’t breathe anymore. The case was a clear example of self-defense, and my task was to demonstrate this to the prosecution.

What the Client Was Facing

Attempted murder is an extremely serious charge in Colorado, with a potential for a very long prison sentence of up to 48 years in the Colorado Department of Corrections for each count. With three victims, my client was facing the possibility of consecutive sentences that could have resulted in life in prison. A conviction would have been devastating for my client.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with attempted murder and the case was set for a preliminary hearing. This hearing is a critical stage in Colorado criminal procedure where the prosecution must show they have enough evidence to proceed to trial. It is essentially a mini trial and in 99% of cases, the prosecution wins this hearing.

Defense Strategy

Our strategy was to present a compelling self-defense case at the preliminary hearing. We gathered all the evidence that showed our client was the victim of an assault and that her actions were a justifiable response to the threat she faced. We highlighted that one of the alleged victims admitted to continuing to assault her even after being stabbed.

Key Defense Actions

• Evidence Presentation: We presented all the evidence supporting the self-defense claim to the District Attorney before the preliminary hearing, including witness statements and physical evidence.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of a preliminary hearing is that the judge could find probable cause and bind the case over for trial, exposing the client to the significant risks and stress of a trial on multiple attempted murder charges. DAs are notorious for taking much harsher stances to plea negotiations after winning preliminary hearings, and sometimes they completely refuse to negotiate. However, by being thoroughly prepared, we aimed to convince the DA to dismiss the case before the hearing even concluded.

Outcome

The District Attorney was so convinced by our presentation of the evidence that they dismissed the case at the preliminary hearing, without the need for us to even argue the motion. This was a complete victory for our client.

Why This Case Matters

This case shows the power of a strong self-defense argument and the importance of knowing whether or not you can present it effectively to the prosecution. This requires deep knowledge of the individual prosecutors in the courtroom and their past history of dealing with similar cases. It demonstrates that Right Law Group is not afraid to take on the most serious charges and that we have the skills to win them and the deep jurisdictional knowledge to do so.

Keywords: Colorado attempted murder defense, self-defense attorney Colorado, preliminary hearing dismissal, violent crimes defense, Right Law Group

 

Case 5: Multiple Domestic Violence Cases Resolved with No DV Convictions

Attorney: Matthew Chaput
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: 4 cases total – 3 misdemeanor DV cases, 1 felony with misdemeanor DV
Potential Sentence: Multiple DV convictions, loss of gun rights, mandatory DV treatment
Outcome: Pled to 2 non-DV charges, 2 cases dismissed, 2 years probation
Practice Area: Domestic Violence Defense, Multiple Case Management

Case Overview

I represented a client who was facing a total of four separate cases, including three misdemeanor domestic violence (DV) cases and one felony case that also included a misdemeanor DV charge. The client was in a very difficult position, with the potential for multiple convictions and significant jail time.

What the Client Was Facing

A conviction in even one of the DV cases would have resulted in the loss of gun rights under federal law (Lautenberg Amendment), mandatory DV treatment, and a permanent criminal record that would be visible to employers and landlords. The felony charge carried the risk of a prison sentence. Multiple DV convictions would have had a devastating cumulative effect on the client’s life.

Procedural Posture

The client had four active cases in the Colorado court system. We were engaged in negotiations with the District Attorney to resolve all of them in a global disposition.

Defense Strategy

My strategy was to negotiate a global resolution of all four cases that would avoid any DV convictions and minimize the overall consequences for the client. I focused on highlighting the weaknesses in the prosecution’s cases and the mitigating circumstances surrounding the allegations. I argued for a creative plea agreement that would consolidate the cases.

Key Defense Actions

• Negotiation: We engaged in extensive negotiations with the District Attorney to craft a creative plea agreement that would resolve all four cases at once while avoiding DV designations.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of fighting four separate cases at trial would have been immense, with the potential for multiple convictions. The tradeoff was to accept a plea to two non-DV offenses in exchange for the dismissal of the felony and the other misdemeanor, and to avoid any DV-related penalties.

Outcome

We successfully negotiated a plea agreement where the client pled to two non-DV offenses. The felony was dismissed, as was the other misdemeanor. The client received a two-year probation sentence with no DV tag, no DV treatment, and no additional jail time. He was only required to complete an alcohol evaluation and comply with any recommended treatment.

Why This Case Matters

This case demonstrates Right Law Group’s ability to handle complex situations involving multiple cases and achieve a favorable global resolution. It shows our skill in negotiating with prosecutors to avoid the most damaging consequences for our clients, such as DV convictions that carry lifetime firearm prohibitions.

Keywords: Colorado domestic violence defense, multiple DV cases, no DV conviction, gun rights protection, Right Law Group

 

Case 6: Menacing Charge with Prior Felonies Results in Probation, Avoiding Prison

Attorney: Matthew Chaput
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Menacing (Felony)
Potential Sentence: Mandatory Prison (Two-Prior-Felony Habitual Criminal Rule – C.R.S. § 18-1.3-801)
Outcome: Probation Sentence
Practice Area: Felony Defense, Sentencing Alternatives

Case Overview

I represented a client charged with menacing for allegedly flashing a gun at two individuals. The case was complicated by the fact that my client had three prior felony convictions, which under Colorado’s two-prior-felony rule (C.R.S. § 18-1.3-801), meant he was facing a mandatory prison sentence and was statutorily ineligible for probation.

What the Client Was Facing

Due to his prior felony convictions, my client was facing a mandatory prison sentence under Colorado law. A menacing conviction would have added another felony to his record and resulted in years in the Colorado Department of Corrections.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with menacing, a felony. The primary obstacle was the statutory bar to probation due to his criminal history under Colorado’s two-prior-felony rule. We were hired during the pretrial stage which was fortunate because once someone with multiple prior felony convictions goes through trial, going to prison is mandatory if convicted.

Defense Strategy

The strategy was to negotiate a disposition that would circumvent the two-prior-felony rule and allow for a probationary sentence. This required convincing the District Attorney to agree to a stipulated sentence that would not trigger the mandatory prison sentence, which is an exception allowed under Colorado law when both parties agree, but it is difficult to do.

Key Defense Actions

• Negotiation: I negotiated with the District Attorney for a stipulated sentence to probation, which is an exception to the two-prior-felony rule when both the prosecution and defense agree.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk was that the DA would refuse to offer a probation-stipulated plea, leaving the client with no choice but to go to trial, where a conviction would have resulted in a mandatory prison sentence. The tradeoff was accepting a lower felony menacing conviction in exchange for avoiding prison.

Outcome

I was able to secure a menacing conviction with a stipulated sentence to probation. This meant my client avoided a prison sentence, which would have been the presumptive outcome given his criminal history.

Why This Case Matters

This case demonstrates our ability to find creative solutions to overcome significant legal hurdles, such as the two-prior-felony rule. It shows that even when a client is facing a mandatory prison sentence under Colorado law, there may be ways to achieve a more favorable outcome through skilled negotiation. Right Law Group is adept at navigating the complexities of Colorado sentencing laws to protect our clients from the most severe penalties.

Keywords: Colorado menacing defense, two prior felony rule, habitual criminal, mandatory prison avoidance, stipulated probation Colorado, Right Law Group

 

Case 7: Not Guilty Verdict in DUI Trial

Attorney: Matthew Chaput
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: DUI (Third Offense)
Potential Sentence: Mandatory jail time, lengthy license revocation
Outcome: Not Guilty Verdict at Trial
Practice Area: DUI Defense, Trial Litigation

Case Overview

I represented a client who was charged with her third DUI offense after crashing her car into a dumpster. The client had gotten into a fight with her husband and drove off in an emotional state. The prosecution’s case relied heavily on the testimony of the arresting officer and the results of the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs).

What the Client Was Facing

A third DUI conviction in Colorado carries significant penalties under C.R.S. § 42-4-1301, including mandatory jail time, a lengthy driver’s license revocation, and substantial fines. It would also have a major impact on her personal and professional life, with increased insurance costs and potential employment consequences.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with DUI and the case proceeded to a jury trial in Colorado.

Defense Strategy

Our trial strategy was to challenge the credibility of the arresting officer and the validity of the SFSTs. We filed a motion in limine to prevent the officer from being certified as an expert in Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN), a key component of the SFSTs. This would limit the officer’s ability to testify about the scientific validity of the tests and undermine the prosecution’s case.

Key Defense Actions

• Motion in Limine: We filed a motion to exclude the officer’s expert testimony on HGN and other SFSTs, arguing that the officer lacked proper certification and that the tests were not administered according to NHTSA standards.
• Cross-Examination: At trial, I rigorously cross-examined the officer on the administration of the SFSTs and the other evidence in the case, exposing inconsistencies and procedural errors.

Risk and Tradeoffs

Going to trial always carries the risk of a conviction. However, in this case, the potential rewards of an acquittal were significant, as it would save the client from the harsh penalties of a third DUI conviction. We believed the weaknesses in the prosecution’s case made this a calculated risk worth taking.

Outcome

We were successful in our motion to limit the officer’s testimony. The jury, after hearing the evidence, found our client not guilty of DUI.

Why This Case Matters

This case demonstrates the importance of challenging the prosecution’s evidence in a DUI case, particularly the SFSTs. It shows that a skilled trial attorney can win a DUI case even when the facts seem unfavorable at first glance. Right Law Group has the trial experience to take on tough DUI cases and win.

Keywords: Colorado DUI trial, not guilty DUI verdict, SFST challenge, HGN expert testimony, DUI defense attorney Colorado, Right Law Group

 

Case 8: Deferred Sentence for Young Client Charged with Making Explosive Devices

Attorney: Zoe Levesque
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Making Explosive Devices
Potential Sentence: Significant prison time for felony explosives charges
Outcome: Deferred Sentence with Probation
Practice Area: Felony Defense, Juvenile/Young Adult Defense

Case Overview

I represented a young client who was charged with making explosive devices in his home. He was caught setting off these devices in a parking lot. This was a very serious charge with the potential for a felony conviction and significant prison time, which would have had a profound and lasting negative impact on this young man’s life.

What the Client Was Facing

A conviction for making explosive devices is a serious felony in Colorado under C.R.S. § 18-12-109. My client was facing a lengthy prison sentence and a permanent criminal record that would have followed him for the rest of his life, making it difficult to find employment, housing, and pursue educational opportunities.

Procedural Posture

My client was charged with a felony and the case was in the pretrial negotiation phase with the District Attorney’s office in Colorado.

Defense Strategy

My primary goal was to avoid a felony conviction for my young client. I focused on highlighting his youth, lack of any prior criminal history, and the fact that this was an isolated incident of poor judgment. I argued that a deferred sentence would be a more appropriate outcome, as it would allow him to learn from his mistake without suffering the lifelong consequences of a felony conviction.

Key Defense Actions

• Negotiation: I engaged in aggressive negotiations with the District Attorney, emphasizing my client’s age, clean record, and potential for rehabilitation, and advocating for a deferred sentence.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of going to trial on such a serious charge would have been substantial. A conviction was a real possibility, and the consequences would have been severe. The tradeoff was to accept a deferred sentence, which would require my client to comply with probation conditions, in exchange for the opportunity to have the case dismissed and sealed.

Outcome

I successfully negotiated a deferred sentence to the charge with probation. This means that upon successful completion of his probation, the charge will be dismissed, and he will be able to have his record sealed under Colorado law. This is a fantastic outcome for a young person who made one serious mistake.

Why This Case Matters

This case shows that Right Law Group is committed to finding solutions that protect the future of our young clients. It demonstrates our ability to negotiate for deferred sentences in serious felony cases, allowing our clients to move forward with their lives without the burden of a permanent criminal record.

Keywords: Colorado explosives defense, aggressive negotiation, deferred sentence Colorado, young adult criminal defense, felony avoidance, Right Law Group

 

Case 9: Career-Saving Dismissal for Air Force Member Charged with Domestic Violence

Attorney: Zoe Levesque
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Violation of Protection Order (Domestic Violence)
Potential Sentence: DV conviction, discharge from military, loss of retirement
Outcome: Dismissed Morning of Trial
Practice Area: Domestic Violence Defense, Military Defense

Case Overview

I represented a client who was an active-duty Air Force member on the verge of retirement. He was charged with a violation of a protection order, a domestic violence offense. A conviction would have ended his military career under the Lautenberg Amendment, cost him his retirement, and jeopardized the funding for his education. The stakes were incredibly high.

What the Client Was Facing

A conviction for a domestic violence offense would have resulted in a mandatory discharge from the Air Force under federal law, the loss of his hard-earned retirement benefits, and the termination of his educational funding. It would have been a catastrophic end to a long and honorable career. Additionally, he would have lost his right to possess firearms permanently.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with violation of a protection order in Colorado. We set the case for trial, signaling to the prosecution that we were prepared to fight the charge.

Defense Strategy

Our strategy was to force the prosecution to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. We prepared for trial, ready to challenge every piece of evidence and every witness. We believed that the prosecution’s case was weak and that they would not be able to meet their burden of proof at trial.

Key Defense Actions

• Trial Preparation: We meticulously prepared for trial, developing a strategy to expose the weaknesses in the prosecution’s case.
• Negotiation: On the morning of trial, we made a final push to convince the District Attorney to dismiss the case, emphasizing the weakness of their evidence.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of going to trial is that a jury could convict, which in this case would have had devastating consequences for our client. However, the risk of accepting a plea to a domestic violence offense was equally unacceptable, as it would have also ended his career. We determined that the best chance for a complete victory was to go to trial.

Outcome

On the morning of trial, the District Attorney finally agreed to dismiss the case, acknowledging that they could not prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt despite the judge disagreeing with the dismissal. This was a complete vindication for our client and saved his career.

Why This Case Matters

This case highlights the importance of being willing to go to trial to protect a client’s future and to never stop fighting. It shows that Right Law Group is not afraid to challenge the prosecution and hold them to their burden of proof. We understand the unique challenges faced by military service members and are committed to fighting for them.

Keywords: Colorado military defense attorney, domestic violence dismissal, military career protection, Lautenberg Amendment, Right Law Group

 

Case 10: DUI Case Dismissed Due to Lack of Reasonable Suspicion and Body Camera Violations

Attorney: Gannon Becker
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: DUI
Potential Sentence: Jail time, fines, license suspension
Outcome: Complete Dismissal
Practice Area: DUI Defense, Constitutional Rights

Case Overview

I represented a client who was charged with a DUI. The case had two significant legal issues: a lack of reasonable suspicion for the initial traffic stop and the arresting officer’s failure to have his body-worn camera activated during portions of the investigation. The client’s blood alcohol content was well over the legal limit, making a dismissal a challenging but necessary goal.

What the Client Was Facing

A DUI conviction carries serious consequences in Colorado under C.R.S. § 42-4-1301, including jail time, fines, and a driver’s license suspension. A conviction would have had a significant negative impact on my client’s life, including increased insurance costs and potential employment consequences.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with DUI. I identified the constitutional issues with the stop and the investigation and prepared to file motions to suppress the evidence under the Fourth Amendment.

Defense Strategy

My strategy was to challenge the legality of the traffic stop and the officer’s failure to follow body camera protocols required by Colorado law and department policy. I drafted motions outlining these issues and presented them to the District Attorney before the motions hearing. I argued that either of these issues was sufficient to warrant a dismissal of the case due to constitutional violations.

Key Defense Actions

• Motion Drafting: I drafted detailed motions to suppress evidence based on the lack of reasonable suspicion for the stop and the body camera violations.
• Negotiation with DA: I presented the motions to the District Attorney before the hearing, explaining the legal basis for why the case should be dismissed and outlining the constitutional violations.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of a motions hearing is that the judge could deny the motions, leaving the client with a very difficult case to win at trial, especially with a blood alcohol content over the legal limit. However, the constitutional violations in this case were so clear that I was confident we had a strong chance of success.

Outcome

Before I even had to proceed with the motions hearing, the District Attorney agreed with my legal analysis and dismissed the case. This was a significant victory, as it is rare to get a DUI case with a high BAC dismissed.

Why This Case Matters

This case demonstrates the importance of holding law enforcement accountable for following constitutional and procedural rules. It shows that a thorough review of the evidence can uncover critical legal issues that can lead to a complete dismissal of the charges. Right Law Group is committed to protecting our clients’ constitutional rights.

Keywords: Colorado DUI dismissal, body camera violations, Fourth Amendment defense, reasonable suspicion challenge, DUI defense attorney Colorado, Right Law Group

 

Case 11: Felony Reckless Discharge Case Dismissed Through Diversion

Attorney: Zoe Levesque
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Reckless Discharge of Firearm (Felony), Shot into Vehicle
Potential Sentence: Prison time for felony weapons charge
Outcome: Dismissal and Sealing
Practice Area: Weapons Crimes Defense, Diversion Programs

Case Overview

I represented a client charged with felony reckless discharge of a firearm for shooting into a vehicle. A review of the evidence revealed that one of the bullets was found in the driver’s side door frame, close to the driver’s seat, which made the case particularly serious. My goal was to find a resolution that would avoid a felony conviction and allow my client to move on with a clean record.

What the Client Was Facing

A felony conviction for reckless discharge of a firearm under C.R.S. § 18-12-107.5 would have resulted in a prison sentence and a permanent criminal record. This would have had a devastating impact on my client’s future, including loss of gun rights and employment opportunities.

Procedural Posture

My client was charged with a felony. We were in the pretrial negotiation phase with the District Attorney’s office in Colorado.

Defense Strategy

My strategy was to negotiate for my client’s entry into a diversion program. Diversion is a program offered in many counties in Colorado that allows a defendant to avoid a conviction by completing certain requirements, such as community service, classes, and restitution. I argued that my client was a good candidate for diversion and that this would be a more just outcome than a felony conviction.

Key Defense Actions

• Negotiation: I negotiated with the District Attorney to allow my client to enter a diversion program, emphasizing his lack of prior criminal history and willingness to take responsibility.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk was that the DA would refuse to offer diversion, forcing the client to either accept a felony plea or go to trial. The tradeoff of diversion is that the client has to admit some level of responsibility and complete the program requirements, but the reward is a complete dismissal of the charges.

Outcome

I was able to get my client into a diversion program. Upon successful completion of the program, the case will be dismissed and sealed under Colorado law. This is an excellent outcome that will allow my client to avoid a felony conviction and move on with his life.

Why This Case Matters

This case shows that Right Law Group is skilled at negotiating for diversion programs, even in serious felony cases. We are committed to finding creative solutions that allow our clients to avoid the devastating consequences of a felony conviction.

Keywords: Colorado weapons defense, diversion program Colorado, reckless discharge dismissal, felony avoidance, Right Law Group

 

Case 12: Felony DUI and All Felony Charges Dismissed

Attorney: Zoe Levesque
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Felony DUI (Fourth Offense), Evading Interlock, Careless Driving
Potential Sentence: Mandatory prison for felony DUI
Outcome: Felony DUI Dismissed, Pled to Careless Driving
Practice Area: DUI Defense, Felony DUI Defense

Case Overview

I represented a client who was charged with his fourth DUI, a felony in Colorado. He was also charged with evading interlock and careless driving. The client’s blood results came back at a level that indicated he was driving while ability impaired (DWAI), but we were able to get the felony DUI charge dismissed.

What the Client Was Facing

A felony DUI conviction in Colorado under C.R.S. § 42-4-1301(1)(a) carries a mandatory prison sentence. The client was also facing additional penalties for the other charges. A conviction would have had a life-altering impact on him, including years in the Colorado Department of Corrections.

Procedural Posture

The client was facing a felony DUI and other charges. The District Attorney was still intent on going to trial on the evading interlock charge even after the felony DUI was dismissed.

Defense Strategy

Our strategy was to attack the felony DUI charge based on the blood test results showing only DWAI levels, and then negotiate a favorable resolution on the remaining charges. We were able to get the felony DUI completely dismissed, which was a huge victory. We then negotiated a plea agreement to careless driving traffic offense only to resolve the rest of the case.

Key Defense Actions

• Negotiation: We negotiated the dismissal of the felony DUI charge based on the blood test results, and then negotiated a plea to a traffic offense to resolve the remaining charges.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of going to trial on a felony DUI is enormous, even with alcohol levels below 0.08. The tradeoff was to accept a plea to a minor traffic offense in exchange for the dismissal of all felony charges and the avoidance of a prison sentence.

Outcome

We were able to get the felony DUI and all other felony charges dismissed. The client ultimately pled to careless driving with no further conditions. This was an incredible outcome that saved the client from a mandatory prison sentence.

Why This Case Matters

This case shows that even when a client is facing a felony DUI, it is possible to achieve a favorable outcome. It demonstrates Right Law Group’s ability to get serious charges dismissed and to negotiate resolutions that protect our clients from the most severe consequences.

Keywords: Colorado felony DUI defense, fourth DUI dismissal, mandatory prison avoidance, DUI defense attorney Colorado, Right Law Group

 

Case 13: Domestic Violence Case Dismissed After 13 Months

Attorney: Jimmy Litle
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Domestic Violence, Assault, Harassment, Criminal Mischief
Potential Sentence: Significant Jail time, loss of gun rights, mandatory Domestic Violence treatment
Outcome: Complete Dismissal and Sealing
Practice Area: Domestic Violence Defense, Trial Litigation

Case Overview

I represented a client charged with domestic violence, assault, harassment, and criminal mischief. The charges stemmed from an argument between the client and his girlfriend, which was partially captured on cell phone and home security cameras. The case was complex and involved extensive litigation that stretched over thirteen months. 

What the Client Was Facing

A domestic violence conviction would have resulted in the loss of gun rights under federal law, mandatory domestic violence treatment, and a permanent criminal record. The client was also facing the possibility of multiple years of jail time. He was adamant he was not the initial aggressor, that he had not committed a crime, and that he could not accept a plea offer.

Procedural Posture

The case went through a lengthy pretrial process in Colorado, including the filing of pretrial motions and multiple motions hearings. The case initially proceeded to a jury trial during which law enforcement admitted they had not turned over all of the evidence. The Court denied our motion to dismiss, but granted a mistrial due to this misconduct. The case was then set for a second trial. After the mistrial, we laid out the obvious shortcomings in the prosecutor’s case, and pushed for a dismissal. The case was dismissed the day before the second trial was scheduled to begin. 

Defense Strategy

Our strategy involved a multi-pronged attack on the prosecution’s case. We filed motions to dismiss certain charges, which were eventually granted. We also highlighted inconsistencies in the police officers’ accounts of what happened, based on their own body-worn camera footage. The mistrial in the first trial also gave us additional leverage in negotiations.

Key Defense Actions

• Motions to Dismiss: We successfully moved to have some of the charges dismissed before the first trial even started. 
• Evidence Review: We meticulously reviewed all evidence, including the body-worn camera footage, to find inconsistencies in law enforcement’s investigation.
• Trial: We took the case to trial and obtained a mistrial due to law enforcement misconduct, which ultimately led to the dismissal of the entire case.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of going to trial is always significant, but in this case, the client was not willing to accept a domestic violence conviction. The first trial was a calculated risk that paid off with a mistrial. The tradeoff for the client was enduring a lengthy and stressful legal battle, but the ultimate reward was a complete dismissal of all charges.

Outcome

Thirteen months after the charges were filed, and after a mistrial during the first jury trial, we were able to get the entire case dismissed and sealed before the second trial even began.

Why This Case Matters

This case demonstrates our tenacity and willingness to fight for our clients, even when it means going through a lengthy and difficult litigation process. It shows that we will not back down when we believe a client is innocent, and that we have the skills to win even the most challenging cases.

Keywords: Jury trial, Colorado domestic violence dismissal, evidence violation, mistrial, DV case dismissed, Right Law Group

 

Case 14: Domestic Violence and Child Abuse Charges Dismissed After Illegal Cell Phone Search

Attorney: Jimmy Litle
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: El Paso County, Colorado
Charge: Domestic Violence, Child Abuse (2 cases)
Potential Sentence: Jail time, loss of parental rights, permanent record
Outcome: Both Cases Dismissed After Motion to Suppress
Practice Area: Domestic Violence Defense, Constitutional Rights, Fourth Amendment

Case Overview

I represented a client who was facing two separate domestic violence cases which also included child abuse charges. The prosecution’s case relied heavily on evidence obtained from one of the children’s cell phones. I identified a critical constitutional issue with how law enforcement had obtained that evidence.

What the Client Was Facing

Domestic violence and child abuse charges are taken very seriously in Colorado. My client was facing the possibility of significant jail time, a permanent criminal record, and the loss of his parental rights. A conviction would have had a devastating impact on his family and his life.

Procedural Posture

The client had two active cases. I filed motions to suppress the evidence obtained from the illegal search of his cell phone under the Fourth Amendment.

Defense Strategy

My strategy was to challenge the legality of the cell phone search. I argued that the police had violated my client’s Fourth Amendment rights by searching his phone without a warrant or a valid exception to the warrant requirement. I filed a motion to suppress all evidence obtained from the illegal search.

Key Defense Actions

• Motion to Suppress: I filed a motion to suppress the evidence from the cell phone, arguing that the search was unconstitutional under Colorado law.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of a motions hearing is that the judge could deny the motion, leaving the client with a difficult case to defend. However, the constitutional violation in this case was clear, and I was confident that we would prevail.

Outcome

After I filed the motion to suppress, the District Attorney dismissed both cases. This was a complete victory for my client, and it was achieved without the need for a risky trial.

Why This Case Matters

This case highlights the importance of protecting our clients’ constitutional rights. It shows that we are not afraid to challenge law enforcement when they overstep their authority. Right Law Group is committed to holding the police accountable and ensuring that our clients’ rights are protected at every stage of the criminal justice process.

Keywords: Colorado Fourth Amendment defense, illegal cell phone search, domestic violence dismissal, child abuse charges dismissed, Right Law Group

 

Case 15: Sisters Wrongfully Charged with Burglary and Theft While Trying to Help At-Risk Sibling

Attorney: Jimmy Litle
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Burglary, Theft (At-Risk Adult Victim)
Potential Sentence: Prison time with at-risk adult enhancer
Outcome: Complete Dismissal and sealing for both clients.
Practice Area: Felony; Burglary; Theft; Property Crimes Defense, Elder Abuse Defense

Case Overview

I represented two sisters who were charged with burglary and theft from their third sister, who was an at-risk adult. The challenge was that I had to make the prosecutors understand that my clients were not stealing from their sibling; they were trying to protect her. The charges were an improper escalation due to law enforcement’s rush to judgement and incomplete investigation. 

What the Client Was Facing

Burglary and theft charges are serious offenses that can result in prison time and a permanent criminal record. The fact that the alleged victim was an at-risk adult made the charges even more severe under Colorado law.

Procedural Posture

The sisters were charged with burglary and theft. The District Attorney’s initial offer was to pursue criminal diversion with no guarantee about the outcome of that process. 

Defense Strategy

My strategy was to convince the District Attorney that the charges were unjust and that my clients were acting in the best interests of their sister. I explained what was really going on – a housekeeper had moved into the third sister’s home and was taking advantage of the third sister. I argued that anything less than a full dismissal was unacceptable and that the charges should be dismissed outright because my clients were trying to help, not harm, their sister.  had to strategically disclose certain aspects of 

Key Defense Actions

• Negotiation: I negotiated with the District Attorney, explaining the true nature of the situation and advocating for a complete dismissal of all charges.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk was that the DA would revoke the diversion offer and possibly insist on mediation or a plea to a lesser charge, which would have still had negative consequences for my clients. The tradeoff was to reject the DA’s initial offer and push for a complete dismissal, which carried the risk of having to go to trial if negotiations failed.

Outcome

I was able to convince the District Attorney to dismiss all charges against both of my clients without the need for diversion, mediation or a plea. The case dismissal and sealing was a complete vindication for my clients.  

Why This Case Matters

This case shows that Right Law Group is committed to fighting for clients who have been wrongfully accused, even when the situation is complex and emotionally charged. It demonstrates our ability to persuade prosecutors to see the truth and to do the right thing.

Keywords: Colorado burglary defense, wrongful prosecution, at-risk adult charges, felony theft charges dismissed, Right Law Group

 

Case 16: Felony Hit and Run with Serious Bodily Injury Reduced to Deferred Sentence

Attorney: Jimmy Litle
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Hit and Run with Serious Bodily Injury (Felony)
Potential Sentence: 6 years prison sentence
Outcome: Deferred Sentence to Careless Driving
Practice Area: Traffic Crimes Defense, Felony Defense

Case Overview

I represented a client charged with hit and run with serious bodily injury, a felony, after an auto-pedestrian crash. The crash occurred at night in a poorly lit neighborhood while two underage individuals were crossing the street. The client was facing a lengthy prison sentence and a permanent felony conviction.

What the Client Was Facing

A conviction for hit and run with serious bodily injury under C.R.S. § 42-4-1601 is a serious felony in Colorado that carries a presumptive prison sentence of two to four years. A conviction would have had a devastating impact on my client’s life.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with a felony. We were in the pretrial negotiation phase with the District Attorney’s.

Defense Strategy

My strategy was to negotiate a disposition that would avoid a felony conviction and a prison sentence. I highlighted the mitigating factors in the case, such as the poor lighting and the fact that the pedestrians were crossing the street in a dangerous location at night. I argued for a deferred sentence to a much less serious charge.

Key Defense Actions

• Negotiation: I negotiated with the District Attorney to drop the felony hit and run charge and agree to a deferred sentence on a lesser charge.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of going to trial on a felony hit and run with serious bodily injury is substantial. The tradeoff was to accept a deferred sentence to careless driving traffic charge, which would require the client to complete certain conditions, in exchange for the dismissal of the felony charge and the avoidance of a prison sentence.

Outcome

I was able to get the felony hit and run charge dropped. The client received a deferred sentence to careless driving with no jail, community service, and a driving class. This plea deal allowed the client to keep his record clear of any conviction because they were able to seal the case after completing the deferred sentence.

Why This Case Matters

This case shows that even in very serious felony cases, it is possible to achieve a favorable outcome through skilled negotiation. It demonstrates Right Law Group’s ability to get felony charges dropped and to negotiate for deferred sentences that protect our clients’ futures.

Keywords: Colorado hit and run defense, felony dismissal, deferred sentence, serious bodily injury case, Right Law Group

 

Case 17: Four Domestic Violence Cases Reduced to a Single Deferred Sentence

Attorney: Jimmy Litle
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: El Paso County, Colorado
Charge: 4 DV cases – Harassment, Violation of Protection Order, Obstructing Police
Potential Sentence: Multiple Domestic Violence convictions, significant jail time, loss of gun rights
Outcome: 3 Cases Dismissed, 1 Deferred Sentence
Practice Area: Domestic Violence Defense, Complex litigation

Case Overview

I represented a client with four separate domestic violence cases. The charges included harassment, violations of protection orders, and obstructing the police. The client was facing the possibility of multiple DV convictions, which would have had a severe and lasting impact on his life.

What the Client Was Facing

With four domestic violence cases, the client was facing the potential for significant jail time, as well as the loss of his gun rights under federal law and a permanent criminal record that would have made it difficult to find employment and housing.

Procedural Posture

The client had four active cases in one county and we were engaged in negotiations with the District Attorney to find a global resolution to all of the legal issues.

Defense Strategy

My strategy was to consolidate all four cases into a single, favorable disposition. I negotiated with the District Attorney to have three of the cases dismissed in exchange for a deferred sentence on the fourth case. This would allow the client to avoid any convictions on his record.

Key Defense Actions

• Negotiation: I negotiated a global resolution of all four cases, which resulted in the dismissal of three of them and a deferred sentence on the fourth.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of fighting four separate trials would have been immense, with a high probability of at least one conviction. The tradeoff was to accept a deferred sentence, which required the client to complete DV treatment and to stay out of trouble for a period of time, in exchange for the dismissal of three cases and the opportunity to have the fourth case dismissed as well.

Outcome

We successfully reduced all four cases down to a single deferred sentence. Three of the cases were dismissed outright. This allows the client to keep any conviction off his record.

Why This Case Matters

This case demonstrates our ability to manage complex situations with multiple pending cases and to negotiate favorable outcomes that protect our clients from the cumulative effect of multiple charges. Right Law Group is skilled at finding creative solutions to even the most daunting legal problems.

Keywords: Colorado multiple DV cases, four cases dismissed, deferred sentence, Right Law Group

 

Case 18: DUI Charges Dropped in Case Involving a Three-Car Accident

Attorney: Jimmy Litle
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: DUI (with three car crash)
Potential Sentence: Jail time, fines, lengthy license suspension
Outcome: DUI Dismissed, Pled to Careless Driving
Practice Area: DUI Defense, Accident Cases

Case Overview

I represented a client who was charged with DUI after causing a three-car accident by turning into the wrong lane of traffic. The client failed the roadside sobriety tests, and the case against them appeared to be very strong. The client was facing serious consequences, including jail time. 

What the Client Was Facing

A DUI conviction, especially one involving an accident, can have severe penalties in Colorado. The client was facing jail time, significant fines, a lengthy driver’s license suspension, and a permanent criminal record.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with DUI. We were in the pretrial negotiation phase with the District Attorney’s office in Colorado.

Defense Strategy

My strategy was to challenge the evidence in the case and to negotiate for a reduction of the charges. I focused on the weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and argued that a DUI conviction was not warranted despite the apparent circumstances.

Key Defense Actions

• Negotiation: I negotiated with the District Attorney to have the DUI charges dropped in exchange for a plea to a significantly lower charge.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of going to trial on a DUI case with an accident is high. The tradeoff was to accept a plea to careless driving in exchange for the dismissal of the DUI charges. This allowed the client to avoid a DUI conviction and the associated penalties.

Outcome

I was able to get the DUI charges dropped. The client pled to careless driving with unsupervised probation. This was an excellent outcome that saved the client from a DUI conviction and all of the negative consequences that would have come with it.

Why This Case Matters

This case shows that even in what appears to be a hopeless DUI case, it is possible to achieve a favorable outcome. It demonstrates Right Law Group’s ability to get DUI charges dropped, even when there is an accident involved.

Keywords: Colorado DUI with accident, DUI charges dropped, careless driving plea, DUI defense attorney Colorado, Right Law Group

 

Case 19: Client Acquitted of All Charges After Shooting a Bear to Protect His Puppies

Attorney: Alexis Austin Litle
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Wildlife Violation (Class 1 Misdemeanor)
Potential Sentence: 18 months jail, loss of gun rights
Outcome: Not Guilty Verdict, Dismissal and Sealing
Practice Area: Wildlife Defense, Self-Defense, Trial Litigation

Case Overview

I represented a client who was charged with a class one misdemeanor for shooting and killing a bear that was trying to attack his puppies in his own backyard. The prosecution argued that my client was not justified in using deadly force to protect his dogs. The client, who worked in the medical field, was facing up to 18 months in jail and the loss of his gun rights and his career.

What the Client Was Facing

A class one misdemeanor is the most serious type of misdemeanor in Colorado, and a conviction would have resulted in a criminal record, potential jail time of up to 18 months, and the loss of his right to own firearms. This would have had a significant impact on his personal and professional life.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with a class one misdemeanor. The District Attorney was unwilling to negotiate a reasonable resolution, so we took the case to trial in Colorado.

Defense Strategy

Our defense was that the client was acting in self defense. We hired experts to testify about bear behavior and the reasonableness of my client’s actions. We also rigorously cross-examined the prosecution’s witnesses to expose the weaknesses in their case.

Key Defense Actions

• Expert Witnesses: We presented expert testimony to support our defense claim regarding bear behavior and the threat posed.
• Cross-Examination: We conducted a thorough cross-examination of the prosecution’s witnesses to expose the weaknesses in their case.
• Trial: We presented a compelling case to the jury, arguing that our client’s actions were justified under the circumstances.

Risk and Tradeoffs

Going to trial is always risky, but in this case, the client was not willing to accept a conviction for protecting himself and his puppies. We were confident in our defense and believed that a jury would understand the client’s actions.

Outcome

After a hard-fought trial, the jury acquitted our client of all charges. His case was then dismissed and sealed under Colorado law.

Why This Case Matters

This case shows that Right Law Group is willing to go to trial to defend our clients’ rights, even in unusual and challenging cases. It demonstrates our commitment to fighting for what is right and our ability to win even the most difficult trials.

Keywords: Colorado wildlife defense, bear shooting case, not guilty verdict, self-defense trial, Right Law Group

 

Case 20: Attempted Murder Charge Reduced to Probation in Drug Deal Shootout

Attorney: Alexis Austin Litle
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Attempted Murder
Potential Sentence: 48 years in Colorado Department of Corrections
Outcome: Reduced to Lower-Level Felony, 2 Years Unsupervised Probation
Practice Area: Violent Crimes Defense, Drug Crimes Defense

Case Overview

I represented a client who was charged with attempted murder in an alleged drug deal gone bad. There was a shootout in a residential neighborhood, and my client was facing multiple years in prison. The case was extremely serious and required extensive litigation and investigation.

What the Client Was Facing

An attempted murder conviction in Colorado carries a very lengthy prison sentence of up to 48 years in the Colorado Department of Corrections. My client was facing the possibility of spending many years behind bars, which would have completely destroyed his life and left his family without support.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with attempted murder. The case was in the pretrial phase, and we engaged in extensive motion practice and investigation.

Defense Strategy

Our strategy was to challenge the prosecution’s case at every turn. We filed multiple motions, including motions to suppress evidence. We spent hundreds of hours reviewing body-worn camera footage and researching legal issues. We also conducted our own investigation into the incident.

Key Defense Actions

• Motions: We filed multiple motions challenging the prosecution’s evidence.
• Evidence Review: We conducted an exhaustive review of all evidence, including hundreds of hours of body-worn camera footage.
• Investigation: We conducted our own investigation to uncover evidence favorable to our client.
• Motion Hearings: We attended multiple motion hearings to argue our positions.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of going to trial on an attempted murder charge is enormous. A conviction would have resulted in a very lengthy prison sentence. The tradeoff was to accept a plea to a lower-level felony with probation, which would allow the client to avoid prison time.

Outcome

After extensive litigation, we were able to plead the client down to a lower-level felony with only two years of unsupervised probation. The client was required to complete community service, but he avoided prison entirely and was allowed to continue his job that required national travel to support his family.

Why This Case Matters

This case demonstrates Right Law Group’s commitment to fighting for our clients, even in the most serious cases. It shows that through persistent advocacy and thorough investigation, we can achieve outcomes that seemed impossible at the outset.

Keywords: Colorado attempted murder defense, drug crime defense, prison avoidance, violent crime negotiation, Right Law Group

 

Case 21: Felony Menacing and Attempted Assault Dismissed in Road Rage Incident

Attorney: Alexis Austin Litle
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: Felony Menacing, Attempted Assault
Potential Sentence: Prison time for felony convictions
Outcome: Complete Dismissal and Sealing
Practice Area: Violent Crimes Defense, Self-Defense, Road Rage Defense

Case Overview

I represented a client who was charged with felony menacing and attempted assault after a road rage incident while off-roading in the mountains of Colorado. Another person tried to run them over, and my client displayed his weapon out the side of his vehicle door. The other people claimed that he was threatening them with the weapon.

What the Client Was Facing

A conviction for felony menacing and attempted assault would have resulted in a prison sentence and a permanent criminal record. This would have had a significant impact on my client’s life, including loss of gun rights.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with felony menacing and attempted assault. The case was in the pretrial phase in Colorado.

Defense Strategy

Our defense was that my client was acting in self-defense. We were able to prove that he was fearful for his life and safety based on the actions of the other people, who had tried to run him over. Our strategy was to present this evidence to the District Attorney and convince them to dismiss the case.

Key Defense Actions

• Investigation: We gathered evidence showing that the other people were the aggressors and that my client was acting in self-defense.
• Negotiation with DA: We presented the evidence to the District Attorney and argued for a dismissal of all charges based on self-defense.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk was that the DA would not accept our self-defense argument and would proceed with the prosecution. However, we presented strong evidence in our favor, and we were confident that we could convince the DA to see the situation from our client’s perspective.

Outcome

We were able to get the case completely dismissed and sealed. This was a complete victory for our client.

Why This Case Matters

This case shows that Right Law Group is skilled at presenting self-defense arguments and getting serious charges dismissed. It demonstrates our commitment to protecting our clients’ rights to defend themselves.

Keywords: Colorado menacing defense, road rage defense attorney, self-defense dismissal, felony charges dismissed, Right Law Group

 

Case 22: DUI Case Dismissed Despite Client Drinking in Parked Car

Attorney: Alexis Austin Litle
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)
Charge: DUI (Actual Physical Control)
Potential Sentence: Jail time, fines, license suspension
Outcome: Complete Dismissal and Sealing
Practice Area: DUI Defense, Actual Physical Control Defense

Case Overview

I represented a client who was charged with DUI for being in actual physical control of a vehicle while intoxicated, even though he was parked in a grocery store parking lot. During the pandemic, the client claimed that he was just sitting in his car drinking and had no intention of driving home. He had even tried to call an Uber to come pick him up.

What the Client Was Facing

A DUI conviction carries serious consequences in Colorado under C.R.S. § 42-4-1301, including jail time, fines, and a driver’s license suspension. A conviction would have had a significant negative impact on my client’s life, including increased insurance costs and potential employment consequences.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with DUI. The case was in the pretrial phase in Colorado.

Defense Strategy

Our defense was that the client was not in actual physical control of the vehicle because he had no intention of driving. We argued that he was simply sitting in his car drinking and waiting for an Uber. We presented evidence of his Uber request to support this claim.

Key Defense Actions

• Evidence Presentation: We presented evidence showing that the client had called for an Uber and had no intention of driving.
• Negotiation with DA: We argued to the District Attorney that the client was not in actual physical control of the vehicle under Colorado law and that the charges should be dismissed.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk was that the DA would not accept our argument and would proceed with the prosecution. However, the evidence supporting our client’s claim was strong, and we were confident that we could convince the DA to dismiss the case.

Outcome

We were able to get all charges dismissed and the client’s record sealed. This was a complete victory.

Why This Case Matters

This case demonstrates Right Law Group’s ability to challenge DUI charges based on the legal concept of actual physical control. It shows that we are skilled at finding creative defenses to DUI charges and getting them dismissed.

Keywords: Colorado DUI actual physical control, DUI dismissal, parked car DUI defense, DUI defense attorney Colorado, Right Law Group

 

Case 23: Vehicular Assault Reduced to Traffic Infraction

Attorney: Jimmy Litle/Alexis Austin Litle (Teresa’s case)
Law Firm: Right Law Group
Location: Colorado (Mountain Roads)
Charge: Vehicular Assault (DUI-related, Felony)
Potential Sentence: Prison time for felony vehicular assault
Outcome: Reduced to Careless Driving (Traffic Offense), No Jail
Practice Area: Vehicular Assault Defense, DUI Defense, Serious Injury Cases

Case Overview

We represented a client who was charged with vehicular assault based on DUI after a serious accident on a windy mountain road. The client turned left to exit the highway and was T-boned by oncoming traffic, resulting in very serious injuries to herself. She was admitted to the hospital and had a significant recuperation time. The felony charges were extremely serious.

What the Client Was Facing

Vehicular assault under C.R.S. § 18-3-205 is a serious felony in Colorado that carries a presumptive prison sentence, especially when DUI is involved. The client was facing years in the Colorado Department of Corrections, as well as a permanent felony conviction.

Procedural Posture

The case was set for trial. We filed numerous motions, including motions to suppress evidence and motions challenging probable cause. There was also a Brady issue involving the prosecution’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence.

Defense Strategy

Our strategy was to challenge every aspect of the prosecution’s case through multiple motions. We filed motions to suppress, motions for lack of probable cause, and highlighted Brady violations. The goal was to either win the motions and get the case dismissed, or create enough doubt to negotiate a favorable resolution.

Key Defense Actions

• Multiple Motions Filed: Motions to suppress, motions for lack of probable cause
• Brady Issue: Identified and argued prosecutorial misconduct for failure to disclose evidence
• Trial Preparation: Set the case for trial to demonstrate our willingness to fight

Risk and Tradeoffs

The risk of going to trial on a vehicular assault charge with serious injuries is substantial. However, the constitutional and procedural violations in the case gave us strong leverage. The tradeoff was accepting a traffic offense rather than risking a felony conviction at trial.

Outcome

Ultimately, the case ended with a careless driving offense, which is a traffic infraction, not a felony charge. The client received no jail time.

Why This Case Matters

This case demonstrates Right Law Group’s ability to take a serious felony vehicular assault case and reduce it to a minor traffic offense through aggressive motion practice and identification of prosecutorial misconduct. It shows our commitment to protecting clients from unjust felony convictions.

Keywords: Colorado vehicular assault defense, DUI vehicular assault, Brady violation, felony reduced to traffic offense, mountain road accident defense, Right Law Group

 

Case 24: Veteran’s Attempted Homicide & Vehicular Assault Charges Dismissed After PTSD Mitigation Defense

Attorney: Alexis Austin Litle

Law Firm: Right Law Group

Location: Colorado (Denver Metro/Front Range)

Charge: Attempted Homicide, Vehicular Assault (Felony)

Potential Sentence: 16-48 years for Attempted Homicide, loss of all VA benefits

Outcome: Deferred Sentence, Complete Dismissal and Sealing

Practice Area: Veteran Criminal Defense, Mental Health Defense, Vehicular Assault Defense

Case Overview

I represented a decorated military veteran who had served multiple tours and was suffering from severe, untreated Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). After struggling to get help from the VA, he attempted to commit suicide by vehicle, leading to charges of attempted homicide and vehicular assault. The alleged victims were adamant about prison time, and the client faced losing his VA benefits, leaving his wife and young daughter with nothing.

What the Client Was Facing

The client was facing a devastating outcome. An attempted homicide conviction carries a potential sentence of 16-48 years in the Colorado Department of Corrections. A felony conviction would have also resulted in the permanent loss of his VA benefits, which were the sole source of support for his family. The federal involvement from the victims added another layer of complexity and pressure.

Procedural Posture

The client was charged with attempted homicide and vehicular assault in a Colorado district court. The case was in the pretrial phase, with the prosecution, heavily influenced by the adamant victims, pushing for a prison sentence.

Defense Strategy

My defense was built around the client’s severe and extensively documented PTSD. Leveraging my own background in psychology, I compiled a comprehensive mitigation package that detailed the impacts of combat-related PTSD and the VA’s failure to provide care. The strategy was to reframe the narrative from a malicious criminal act to a desperate cry for help from a veteran failed by the system he served. We argued that treatment, not prison, was the just and appropriate response.

Key Defense Actions

• PTSD Mitigation Package: Developed an exhaustive file with expert reports, military service records, and documentation of the client’s attempts to seek help from the VA.
• Psychology-Informed Advocacy: Used my academic background in psychology to argue the nuances of PTSD and its influence on my client’s mental state and actions.
• Intensive DA Negotiations: Engaged in persistent and strenuous negotiations with the District Attorney, countering the victims’ demands for prison with a compelling case for a therapeutic and restorative outcome.

Risk and Tradeoffs

The primary risk was the victims’ federal involvement and their unwavering demand for a prison sentence, which put immense pressure on the DA to reject a lenient plea. Going to trial would have been incredibly risky, as a jury might not have been swayed by the PTSD defense in the face of the serious charges. The tradeoff was agreeing to a deferred sentence, which required a period of strict compliance, to avoid the catastrophic risk of a lengthy prison term and loss of benefits.

Outcome

After extensive argument, I successfully convinced the District Attorney to agree to a deferred sentence. My client completed all the requirements of the deferred sentence, and the case was subsequently dismissed and fully sealed. This outcome preserved his VA benefits and kept his family intact.

Why This Case Matters

This case is a powerful example of how a defense grounded in mental health mitigation can achieve extraordinary results, even against immense prosecutorial and victim pressure. It highlights Right Law Group’s unique ability to handle complex cases involving veterans and PTSD, using a deep understanding of psychology to reframe the narrative and secure a just outcome. The client is now a mentor to other veterans navigating the court system, turning his darkest moment into a source of hope for others.

Keywords: Colorado veteran criminal defense, PTSD defense attorney, attempted homicide dismissal, vehicular assault defense, deferred sentence for veteran, Right Law Group

 

Contact Right Law Group

For Colorado Criminal Defense and DUI Representation:

Right Law Group has successfully defended clients throughout Colorado against serious criminal charges, including violent crimes, DUI offenses, domestic violence cases, drug crimes, and weapons charges. Our attorneys bring extensive experience from both sides of the courtroom, having served as prosecutors and specialized defense advocates.

 

Primary Service Areas:

• Denver County (Denver, Glendale, Englewood)
• El Paso County (Colorado Springs, Fountain, Manitou Springs)
• Douglas County (Castle Rock, Lone Tree, Parker, Highlands Ranch)
• Arapahoe County (Aurora, Centennial, Littleton, Greenwood Village)
• Jefferson County (Lakewood, Arvada, Golden, Westminster)

 

Additional Coverage:

• Teller County (Woodland Park, Cripple Creek)
• Pueblo County (Pueblo)
• Fremont County (Cañon City)

 

Our attorneys handle:

• Felony violent crimes (assault, attempted murder, homicide)
• DUI and DWAI (including felony DUI)
• Domestic violence charges
• Drug crimes and weapons offenses
• Property crimes (burglary, theft, trespassing)
• Traffic crimes (vehicular assault, hit and run)
• Constitutional violations and illegal searches
• Trial litigation 

 

Case Results Include:

• Complete dismissals and sealings
• Not guilty verdicts at trial
• Deferred sentences in serious felony cases
• Reduced charges avoiding prison time
• Protection of gun rights and professional licenses

For a consultation regarding your Colorado criminal defense matter, contact Right Law Group.

Disclaimer: These case studies represent actual cases handled by Right Law Group attorneys. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Each case is unique and results depend on the specific facts and circumstances. These case studies are provided for informational purposes and do not constitute legal advice.